Suppose that the nearby campers impose a cost of $500 on you and your roommate. If they had to move to a campsite where they could make as much noise as they wished, they would incur a cost of $200. Think of this as the cost of having to physically pack up their stuff and hike to another site. If they stayed and had to be quiet and not disturb you, they would incur a cost of $300. The park rules specify that whoever arrived first has a right to an undisturbed camping spot. Which of the following outcomes would be consistent with the Coase theorem? a. You would pay them $250 to move.
b. They would pay you $180 to stay where they are.
c. They would move, as the cost to keep quiet would be more than the cost to move.
d. They would pay you $600 to stay where they are.

a. You would pay them $250 to move.

Explanation:

The Coase Theory states that in order to solve problems, you must choose the most efficient economic solution regardless of who has property or use rights.

if the campers stay, you will lose $500 (in satisfaction)

cost of moving them is $200

cost of staying and being quiet is $300

it is cheaper to pay them between $200 and $299 so that they move somewhere else

C: They would move, as the cost to keep quiet would be more than the cost to move.

Explanation:

Because you hold the property rights, you have the right to an undisturbed campsite. Therefore, there are three possibilities: they can move; they can stay but have to remain quiet; or they can stay, make as much noise as they wish, but have to compensate you for the costs they impose on you. We can eliminate the last solution easily, as paying you $180 would not be enough to compensate you for the $500 cost they would impose on you, and $600 would be more than it would cost them to move or stay and be quiet. Therefore, they either have to move, or they have to stay and be quiet. If they move, they will incur a cost of $200. If they stay and be quiet, they will incur a cost of $300. Therefore, they will move to a different campsite, and you will get your peace and quiet back.

net worth is the difference between what you own and what you have. if you exceed your liabilities you have a positive net worth. if your liabilities are greater than your assets you have a negative net worth. its a snapshot of your financial situation. if you calculate your net worth you will see the end result of everything you've earned and spent as of now. net worth statements and all you asked of can you determine where you are, how to get where you want to be, if your spending   to much. honestly it can tell you a lot of things. i can go on, but you can paint the picture from here.

explanation:

answerobservation;