A faculty member is retiring, and a committee has been established to select a replacement. HR conducts candidate recruitment, and the selection committee proceeds through the interview process. However, the dean has already made the decision to select David, one of his friends who is in the interview pool, for the open position. Since David is not fully qualified for the position, the dean rewrites the job description to fit David’s qualifications. Discuss the ethics of this situation using the distributive justice framework of moral principles.

The dean has violated the brights of other members to be picked for the violation through this act of favoritism.

Explanation:

This dean has gone ahead to rewrite David's description. By so doing he has altered the job description to favor david. This shows a bias to David in the side of this dean thereby causing him to violate the act that says that there should be no discrimination or bias of my form.

Rewriting the job description to favor david is against the ethics of the distributive justice framework which says that the distribution of goods in a society must be done In an equitable manner for all. 2 principles of this are applicable here. The rights based justice and also the legal justice. Rights based justice demands that the rights of people bare respected which the dean has clearly also violated.

answer; /// blank(1); increases; blank(2); decreases;