subject
Business, 21.09.2020 08:01 fromthebranch13

Businesses have long sought new and innovative ways to lower their costs for producing goods and services. Sometimes their quest includes buying raw materials and equipment from overseas suppliers for lower prices. Sometimes they might borrow from foreign lenders who are offering lower interest rates than can be obtained domestically. But for the last several decades at least, the focus has been on moving jobs to countries where labor costs are low. This practice is called offshoring. In fact, it seems like just yesterday that manufacturers were moving their production facilities to Mexico. A business-friendly government combined with an abundant supply of low-cost labor made the northern Mexican border a perfect place to set up shop. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) made it relatively painless for businesses to move materials and finished goods back and forth across the U. S.-Mexico border as needed. But the good times slowed beginning around 2003 as Mexican wages crept higher and higher. At the same time, though, China began to emerge as the world’s newest low-cost manufacturing center. Low wages, combined with a nearly endless supply of potential workers, caused hundreds and hundreds of manufacturers to start shutting down their Mexican operations (as well as operations in other low-wage countries) and moving to China. For the next decade, China’s burgeoning manufacturing prowess firmly established that country as the low-cost manufacturing hub. But sometimes history has a way of repeating itself. As China’s economy boomed, local workers demanded—and received—higher wages. For example, in 2003, Mexican wages were six times higher than comparable wages in China. By 2013, wages in China had escalated to the point where they were almost half of comparable wages in Mexico. Factoring in international shipping costs, manufacturers whose primary markets are in the Western Hemisphere came to see that total costs of producing in Mexico versus China were about the same. Not surprisingly, then, some firms that once abandoned Mexico for China have started to reverse their course. Casabella, for example, makes cleaning supplies and kitchen gadgets. It moved from Mexico to China in 2003 but moved back to Mexico in 2015. Similarly, the Manufacturing Marvel company has long produced toys and novelty items in both China and Mexico. But when the firm’s Chinese contracts expired in 2015, the company closed its Chinese operations altogether and now centers all of its manufacturing in Mexico. Mexico probably won’t be the last stop for these firms, however, because for low-cost manufacturers, it generally pays to be where the lowest labor and materials costs are located. But now, at least, Mexico seems to be rising once again. Interestingly, too, some companies that once moved jobs from the United States to other low-wage countries have also started bringing those jobs back to the United States. Both General Electric and Caterpillar, for example, have recently shut down foreign factories and relocated that work back to the United States. In these cases, however, the impetus was not low wages but the inability of some foreign workers to meet rigid quality standards.1 Think It Over
1. What can these examples tell us about the pros and cons of offshoring?
2. What conditions might cause a country’s labor costs to remain low for an extended period of time?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 04:30
Required prepare the necessary adjusting entries in the general journal as of december 31, assuming the following: on september 1, the company entered into a prepaid equipment maintenance contract. birch company paid $3,400 to cover maintenance service for six months, beginning september 1. the payment was debited to prepaid maintenance. supplies on hand at december 31 are $3,900. unearned commission fees at december 31 are $7,000. commission fees earned but not yet billed at december 31 are $3,500. (note: debit fees receivable.) birch company's lease calls for rent of $1,600 per month payable on the first of each month, plus an annual amount equal to 1% of annual commissions earned. this additional rent is payable on january 10 of the following year. (note: be sure to use the adjusted amount of commissions earned in computing the additional rent.)
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 06:30
Ummit record company is negotiating with two banks for a $157,000 loan. fidelity bank requires a compensating balance of 24 percent, discounts the loan, and wants to be paid back in four quarterly payments. southwest bank requires a compensating balance of 12 percent, does not discount the loan, but wants to be paid back in 12 monthly installments. the stated rate for both banks is 9 percent. compensating balances will be subtracted from the $157,000 in determining the available funds in part a. a-1. calculate the effective interest rate for fidelity bank and southwest bank. (do not round intermediate calculations. input your answers as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places.) a-2. which loan should summit accept? southwest bank fidelity bank b. recompute the effective cost of interest, assuming that summit ordinarily maintains $37,680 at each bank in deposits that will serve as compensating balances
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:00
Pennewell publishing inc. (pp) is a zero growth company. it currently has zero debt and its earnings before interest and taxes (ebit) are $80,000. pp's current cost of equity is 10%, and its tax rate is 40%. the firm has 10,000 shares of common stock outstanding selling at a price per share of $48.00. refer to the data for pennewell publishing inc. (pp). pp is considering changing its capital structure to one with 30% debt and 70% equity, based on market values. the debt would have an interest rate of 8%. the new funds would be used to repurchase stock. it is estimated that the increase in risk resulting from the added leverage would cause the required rate of return on equity to rise to 12%. if this plan were carried out, what would be pp's new value of operations? a. $484,359 b. $521,173 c. $584,653 d. $560,748 e. $487,805
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:00
Which motion below could be made so that the chair would be called on to enforce a violated rule?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Businesses have long sought new and innovative ways to lower their costs for producing goods and ser...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 01.05.2021 07:40
question
Mathematics, 01.05.2021 07:40
question
Mathematics, 01.05.2021 07:40
question
Mathematics, 01.05.2021 07:40
Questions on the website: 13722367