According to the article, what should you do if you suspect your boss of unethical business practices?

Can you with personal finance homework1 abbreviation of annual percentage rate which the interest rate is applied annually to a loan or a credit card balance2 abbreviation of annual percentage yield the rate of return earn in the course of one whole year taking compounding into amount expressed as a percentage3 cash and other liquid assets such as demand deposits or treasury bills than individual possesses4 an expense that does not vary from one time period to the next5 to obtain a new loan for something on different terms often involving the pain off of an existing high-interest loan by means of a new lower interest one6 money set aside for future use7 to take money out of an account8 to plan the allocation expenditure or use of money9 the amount of money spent on food clothing and other basic necessities10 the amount of money that is anticipated to be received over a. of time either as payment for work goods or services or as profit on capital

In march 2012, the state of california started requiring that all packaging for food and drink with the additive 4-methylimidazole (4-mi) be clearly labeled with a cancer warning. because of this, both pepsi and coke changed their formula to eliminate 4-mi as an ingredient. if pepsi and coke did not change their formula, holding all else constant, what would have happened to the demand for these goods, assuming pepsi and coke were in a competitive market? a. the demand curve for both pepsi and coke would have shifted to the right, causing the price of both products to decrease and the profits for the companies to fall. b. the demand curve for pepsi and coke would have remained unchanged, but the price of both products would have decreased and the profits for the companies would have fallen. c. the demand curve for pepsi and coke would have decreased, but the prices and profits would not have changed. d. the demand curve for only one of them would change because pepsi and coke are substitutes. e. the demand curve for pepsi and coke would have shifted to the left, causing the price of both products to decrease and the profits for both companies to fall.

How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.