Jamie lee jackson, age 26, is in her last semester of college and is waiting for graduation day that is just around the corner! it is the time of year again when jamie lee must file her annual federal income taxes. last year, she received an increase in salary from the bakery, which brought her gross monthly earnings to $3,350, and also opened up an ira, to which she contributed $400 last year. her savings accounts earn 2% interest per year, and she also had received an unexpected $2,300 gift from her great aunt. jamie was also lucky enough last year to win a raffle prize of $3,600, most of which was deposited into her regular savings account after paying off her credit card balance

Consider the scenario below and let us know if you believe lauren smith's actions to be ethical. let us know why or why not. lauren smith is the controller for sports central, a chain of sporting goods stores. she has been asked to recommend a site for a new store. lauren has an uncle who owns a shopping plaza in the area of town where the new store is to be located, so she decides to contact her uncle about leasing space in his plaza. lauren also contacted several other shopping plazas and malls, but her uncle’s store turned out to be the most economical place to lease. therefore, lauren recommended locating the new store in her uncle’s shopping plaza. in making her recommendation to management, she did not disclose that her uncle owns the shopping plaza. if management decided to go with lauren's uncle's plaza, what additional information would be needed in the financial statements?

Vendors provide restaurants with what? o a. cooked items ob. raw materials oc. furniture od. menu recipes

David paid $975,000 for two beachfront lots in coastal south carolina, with the intention of building residential homes on each. two years later, the south carolina legislature passed the beachfront management act, barring any further development of the coast, including david's lots. when david files a complaint to seek compensation for his property, south carolina refuses, pointing to a passage in david's own complaint that states "the beachfront management act [was] properly and validly designed to south carolina's " is south carolina required to compensate david under the takings clause?