When would a court consider the adequacy of consideration? Select one: A. To verify that a sale of assets was not done to avoid payment to creditors. B. When one party has promised forbearance as consideration. C. To verify that one party gave a promise in return for the act of another party. D. To verify that each party gave a valid promise to the other party. E. To verify that property was sold at its fair market value.

E. To verify that property was sold at its fair market value

Explanation:

Adequacy of consideration is an aspect of law that says a lawful agreement is made when the buyer of a good or service gives a fair price for offerings made by the seller.

The fair price may however come in different forms - property, a promise to perform an action, an act, or money.

For example if a person offers to sell a car at $3,000 and the buyer accepts this price, the agreement is said to have adequate consideration.

If a court determines that a contract does not meet fair market price of goods and services sold, it can nullify the contract

im thinking a but im not 100% sure

explanation:

there is a app that you show the question and it anwsers it in the app store