Due to an uncertainty whether or not a new tax is applicable to printing companies, ABC Printers submitted a legal query to the Bureau of Internal Revenue on that issue. The BIR issued a ruling that printing companies are not covered by the new law. Relying on this ruling, ABC Printers did not pay said tax. Subsequently, however, the BIR reversed the ruling and issued a new one stating that the tax covers printing companies. Could the BIR now assess ABC Printers for back taxes corresponding to the years before the new ruling?

No, a reversal of a ruling shall not be given a retroactive application if it will be prejudicial to the taxpayer.

Explanation:

Based on the information provided it can be said that No, a reversal of a ruling shall not be given a retroactive application if it will be prejudicial to the taxpayer. Meaning that the BIR can not assess ABC Printers for back taxes because ABC Printers was following the rulings made by BIR at that time correctly, the change in ruling applies to taxes only after the change has been made and not before. Therefore as long as ABC Printers begins paying taxes now, then the BIR has no standing.

answer; /// that is so (false);