Suppose there are two possible income distributions in a society of ten people. In the first distribution, nine people have incomes of $35,000 and one person has an income of $20,000. In the second distribution, all ten people have incomes of $30,000. If the society had the first income distribution, the utilitarian would argue that the marginal utility of income for the person with an income of $35,000 is than the marginal utility of income for someone with an income of $20,000, so income be redistributed. Rawls considers distribution to be more equitable. True or False: Nozick considers the second distribution to be more equitable. True False