subject
Business, 06.05.2020 03:15 bensleytristap93y8q

Breakdown of a cartel agreement Consider a town in which only two residents, Jake and Latasha, own wells that produce water safe for drinking. Jake and Latasha can pump and sell as much water as they want at no cost. For them, total revenue equals profit. The following table shows the town's demand schedule for water. Price Quantity Demanded Total Revenue (Dollars per gallon) (Gallons of water) (Dollars) 3.60 0 0 3.30 35 $115.50 3.00 70 $210.00 2.70 105 $283.50 2.40 140 $336.00 2.10 175 $367.50 1.80 210 $378.00 1.50 245 $367.50 1.20 280 $336.00 0.90 315 $283.50 0.60 350 $210.00 0.30 385 $115.50 0 420 0 Suppose Jake and Latasha form a cartel and behave as a monopolist. The profit-maximizing price is per gallon, and the total output is gallons. As part of their cartel agreement, Jake and Latasha agree to split production equally. Therefore, Jake's profit is , and Latasha's profit is . Suppose that Jake and Latasha have been successfully operating as a cartel. They each charge the monopoly price and sell half of the monopoly quantity. Then one night before going to sleep, Jake says to himself, "Latasha and I aren't the best of friends anyway. If I increase my production to 35 gallons more than the cartel amount, I can increase my profit even though her profit goes down. I will do that starting tomorrow." After Jake implements his new plan, the price of waterincreases to per gallon. Given Latasha and Jake's production levels, Jake's profit becomes and Latasha's profit becomes . Because Jake has deviated from the cartel agreement and increased his output of water to 35 gallons more than the cartel amount, Latasha decides that she will also increase her production to 35 gallons more than the cartel amount. After Latasha increases her production, Jake's profit becomes , Latasha's profit becomes , and total profit (the sum of the profits of Jake and Latasha) is now . True or False: Based on the fact that both Jake and Latasha increased production from the initial cartel quantity, you know that the output effect was smaller than the price effect at that quantity. True False Jake and Latasha have each cheated on their cartel agreement and increased production by 35 gallons more than the cartel amount. However, they both realize that if they continue to increase output beyond this amount, they'll each suffer a decrease in profit. (To see this for yourself, consider Jake's profit when he produces 70 gallons more than the cartel amount compared to his profit when he produces 35 gallons more than the cartel amount.) Neither Jake nor Latasha has an incentive to further increase output, nor does either have an incentive to decrease output. This outcome is an example oftying .

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 10:40
You were able to purchase two tickets to an upcoming concert for $100 apiece when the concert was first announced three months ago. recently, you saw that stubhub was listing similar seats for $225 apiece. what does it cost you to attend the concert?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:00
Abank provides its customers mobile applications that significantly simplify traditional banking activities. for example, a customer can use a smartphone to take a picture of a check and electronically deposit into an account. this unique service demonstrates the bank’s desire to practice which one of porter’s strategies?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:10
Bonds often pay a coupon twice a year. for the valuation of bonds that make semiannual payments, the number of periods doubles, whereas the amount of cash flow decreases by half. using the values of cash flows and number of periods, the valuation model is adjusted accordingly. assume that a $1,000,000 par value, semiannual coupon us treasury note with three years to maturity has a coupon rate of 3%. the yield to maturity (ytm) of the bond is 7.70%. using this information and ignoring the other costs involved, calculate the value of the treasury note:
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:20
You are the cfo of a u.s. firm whose wholly owned subsidiary in mexico manufactures component parts for your u.s. assembly operations. the subsidiary has been financed by bank borrowings in the united states. one of your analysts told you that the mexican peso is expected to depreciate by 30 percent against the dollar on the foreign exchange markets over the next year. what actions, if any, should you take
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Breakdown of a cartel agreement Consider a town in which only two residents, Jake and Latasha, own w...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 28.01.2020 07:31
question
Biology, 28.01.2020 07:31
Questions on the website: 13722367