Business, 21.04.2020 17:33 caromaybelline71

A friend convinced the owner of a vacant store to allow him use of the store for a one-year period for $12,000, to be payable in monthly installments of $1,000. This amount was significantly below its fair rental value. Their agreement was not reduced to writing. Near the end of the year, the friend and the owner discussed an extension of the arrangement, but did not arrive at an agreement. The owner informed the friend that, if the friend remained, the rent would be raised to its market value. The friend objected. After the end of the one-year period, the friend remained in the store. The friend sent the owner a $1,000 rent check. The owner returned it to the friend, indicating that the rent was now the fair rental value of the premises. Is the owner correct that the friend is obligated to pay the fair rental value of the premises?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 21.06.2019 19:30

Consumer surplus is: the difference between the price of a product and what consumers were willing to pay for the product. the difference between the discounted price of a product and its retail price. the difference between the price paid by consumers and the price required of producers. the difference between the price of a product and consumers' valuation of the last unit of the product purchased.

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 13:30

Jose recently died with a probate estate of $900,000. he was predeceased by his wife, guadalupe, and his daughter, lucy. he has two surviving children, pete and fred. jose was also survived by eight grandchildren, pete’s three children, naomi, daniel, nick; fred’s three children, heather, chris and steve; and lucy’s two children, david and rachel. jose’s will states the following “i leave everything to my three children. if any of my children shall predecease me then i leave their share to their heirs, per stirpes.” which of the following statements is correct? (a) under jose’s will rachel will receive $150,000. (b) under jose’s will chris will receive $150,000. (c) under jose’s will nick will receive $100,000. (d) under jose’s will pete will receive $200,000.

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 19:50

Bulldog holdings is a u.s.-based consumer electronics company. it owns smaller firms in japan and taiwan where most of its cell phone technology is developed and manufactured before being released worldwide. which of the following alternatives to integration does this best illustrate? a. venture capitalism b. franchising c. joint venture d. parent-subsidiary relationship

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 21:10

You are the manager of a large crude-oil refinery. as part of the refining process, a certain heat exchanger (operated at high temperatures and with abrasive material flowing through it) must be replaced every year. the replacement and downtime cost in the first year is $165 comma 000. this cost is expected to increase due to inflation at a rate of 7% per year for six years (i.e. until the eoy 7), at which time this particular heat exchanger will no longer be needed. if the company's cost of capital is 15% per year, how much could you afford to spend for a higher quality heat exchanger so that these annual replacement and downtime costs could be eliminated?

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

A friend convinced the owner of a vacant store to allow him use of the store for a one-year period f...

Questions