Business, 04.04.2020 09:24 ivannis875

Suppose the average income of a citizen of Poland is higher than the average income of a citizen of Romania. You might conclude that a. Polish firms are faced with stricter government regulations than Romanian firms. b. total income is divided among fewer workers in Poland since it has a smaller labor force than Romania. c. Romania's climate allows for longer growing seasons and therefore Romania can produce large quantities of grain and other crops. d. productivity in Poland is higher than in Romania.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 05:30

Sally is buying a home and the closing date is set for april 20th. the annual property taxes are $1,234.00 and have not been paid yet. using actual days, how much will the buyer be credited and the seller be debited

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 09:50

phillips, inc. had the following financial data for the year ended december 31, 2019. cash $ 41,000 cash equivalents 75,000 long term investments 59,000 total current liabilities 149,000 what is the cash ratio as of december 31, 2019, for phillips, inc.? (round your answer to two decimal places.)

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 17:30

Jeanie had always been interested in how individuals and businesses effectively allocate their resources in order to accomplish personal and organizational goals. that’s why she majored in economics and took on an entry-level position at an accounting firm. she is very interested in further advancing her career by looking into a specialization that builds upon her academic background, and her interest in deepening her understanding of how companies adjust their operating results to incorporate the economic impacts of their practices on internal and external stakeholders. which specialization could jeanie follow to get the best of both worlds? jeanie should chose to get the best of both worlds.

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 19:00

Which of the following is likely not a benefit of requiring a grand jury to listen to and examine all of the evidence against a person suspected of committing a serious crime and then independently deciding whether or not to hand down an indictment? 1.the grand jury system provides the accused another safeguard against being sent to trial and facing conviction based on flawed evidence. 2.the members of the grand jury are drawn from the community and are empowered to render independent decisions about whether or not the government has collected enough evidence to bring an individual to trial. 3.the grand jury’s decision can provide prosecutors insight into what is necessary to build a sufficient case if a similar crime is presented later. 4.the grand jury is impaneled to rubber-stamp prosecutors’ cases, which makes it possible for more cases to reach trial.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Suppose the average income of a citizen of Poland is higher than the average income of a citizen of...

Questions