Business, 04.04.2020 02:23 fraven1819

Question 1 [duopoly dominant firm]: Consider the global market for crude oil, consisting of Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the rest of the world. Suppose that price-taking consumers in the rest of the world have demand for crude oil given by: P = 500-075Q Assume that price-taking fringe suppliers of crude oil in the rest of the world have marginal costs given by: p = 400 + 0.6Q Suppose that Saudi Arabia has marginal costs given by: P = 50 + 0.25Q. And that Iran has marginal costs given by: P = 50 + 0.50 Assume that neither Iran nor Saudi Arabia has demand of their own. Suppose that Saudi Arabia and Iran are contemplating forming a Cournot duopoly cartel Hint: assume residual demand reflects case 3). What is the optimal amount of crude oil that Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the rest of the world produces? What is the equilibrium price of crude oil in the market? What is the mark-up charged by Saudi Arabia and Iran? What are the profits to Saudi Arabia and Iran? What is the share of Saudi Arabia's production to total duopoly production? How does the Cournot mark-ups compare to the full enforcement (multi-plant monopoly consisting of Saudi Arabia and Iran) mark-ups? a. b. c. d. e. f. Nou, suppose instead that rest of uorld fringe supply is given by: P 150 + 050. Suppose that Saudi Arabia and Iran are again contemplating forming a Cournot duopoly cartel. (Hint: assume residual demand reflects case 1). g. What is the optimal amount of crude oil that Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the rest of the world produces? h. What is the equilibrium price of crude oil in the marketi? i. What is the mark-up charged by Saudi Arabia and Iran? j. What are the profits to Saudi Arabia and Iran? k. What is the share of Saudi Arabia's production to total duopoly production? L How does the Cournot mark-ups compare to the full enforcement (multi-plant monopoly consisting of Saudi Arabia and Iran) mark-ups? m. Compare your results for these two cases. What insights might this question have for the OPEC strategy game?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 08:40

The following selected circumstances relate to pending lawsuits for erismus, inc. erismus’s fiscal year ends on december 31. financial statements are issued in march 2019. erismus prepares its financial statements according to u.s. gaap. required: indicate the amount erismus would record as an asset, liability, or not accrued in the following circumstances. 1. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes the company has a slightly worse than 50/50 chance of eventually prevailing in court, and that if it loses, the judgment will be $1,000,000. 2. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. if it loses, management believes that damages could fall anywhere in the range of $2,000,000 to $4,000,000, with any damage in that range equally likely. 3. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. if it loses, management believes that damages will eventually be $5,000,000, with a present value of $3,500,000. 4. erismus is a plaintiff in a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company eventually will prevail in court, and that if it prevails, the judgment will be $1,000,000. 5. erismus is a plaintiff in a lawsuit. erismus’s management believes it is virtually certain that the company eventually will prevail in court, and that if it prevails, the judgment will be $500,000.

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 10:10

Rats that received electric shocks were unlikely to develop ulcers if the

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 18:00

Abbington company has a manufacturing facility in brooklyn that manufactures robotic equipment for the auto industry. for year 1, abbingtonabbington collected the following information from its main production line: actual quantity purchased-200 units, actual quantity used-110 units, units standard quantity-100 units, actual price paid-$8 per unit, standard price-$10 per unit. atlantic isolates price variances at the time of purchase. what is the materials price variance for year 1? 1. $400 favorable. 2. $400 unfavorable. 3. $220 favorable. 4. $220 unfavorable.

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 02:00

When the two countries did not specialize, the total production of jeans was 23 million pairs per month, and the total production of corn was 68 million bushels per month. because of specialization, the total production of jeans has increased by million pairs per month, and the total production of corn has increased by million bushels per month. because the two countries produce more jeans and more corn under specialization, each country is able to gain from trade?

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Question 1 [duopoly dominant firm]: Consider the global market for crude oil, consisting of Saudi Ar...

Questions