On Jessica's 21st birthday, her parents planned a large party for her. As part of the festivities, they hired a band, ordered $600 worth of vases for decorations, hired a company to set up tables and chairs, ordered $400 worth of balloons, and as a present to their daughter, gave her a small house to live in. For each of the contracts listed below, identify whether or not the contract needs to be in writing under the Statute of Frauds. Provide detailed rationale for your decision. You will receive three (3) points for addressing each of the contracts listed below, for a total of 15 points for this section.

Under the statue of the misrepresentation, particular sorts of agreements ought to be recorded as a hard copy to be enforceable in the official courtroom.  

Agreement for the band:  

It is for the conveyance of administrations, so it doesn't fall under the statue of misrepresentation. Therefore, it shouldn't be recorded as a hard copy. Further, the agreement is to be performed inside the one year. It further guarantees that the agreement shouldn't be recorded as a hard copy.  

Agreement for the jars:  

It ought to be recorded as a hard copy on the grounds that the estimation of the jars is $600 that is more than $500. According to the resolution of the misrepresentation, the offer of merchandise contract worth more than $500 ought to be recorded as a hard copy. As indicated by this standard, the agreement for containers ought to likewise be recorded as a hard copy to make in enforceable.  

Agreement to set up the tables and seats:  

This agreement is for the administrations and is to be finished inside the one year. Along these lines, it shouldn't be recorded as a hard copy as it doesn't fall under the statue of extortion.  

Agreement for the inflatables:  

It is for the offer of products by the estimation of merchandise is just $400 that is not exactly the $500. According to the rule of the extortion, the offer of products contract worth more than $500 ought to be recorded as a hard copy. In this way, this agreement ought not be recorded as a hard copy.  

Agreement to move the house:  

It manages the purchase and sell of the land property. At that point, it ought to be recorded as a hard copy according to the statue of extortion. The given resolution explicitly notices such agreement including the land or land property to be recorded as a hard copy to make it enforceable.

answer; i believe the correct answer is (4.0);

answer; depth;