If you were using the Fiedler contingency model of leadership to establish a scenario in your company which gives managers maximum control, which of the following combinations of situational dimensions would you seek to achieve? good leader-member relations, low position power, and unstructured jobs less structured jobs, strong position power, and moderate leader-member relations broad employee responsibilities, low position power, and moderate leader-member relations high task structure, good leader-member relations, and strong position power limited position power, good leader-member relations, and low task structure

The correct answer is letter "D": high task structure, good leader-member relations, and strong position power.

Explanation:

Austrian researcher Fred E. Fiedler (1922-2017) proposed in his Contingency Theory that there is no set style of leadership since they would depend on the situation that requested a certain type of leader. That situation, referred in Fiedler's theory as "Situational Favorableness", depended on:

Fiedler stated that maximum control is achieved when leaders have high task structure, good leader-member relations, and strong position power.

b.

c.

d.

g.

those r all of them i believe

the correct answer is - no.

winnipeg, canada, is not further away from the equator than moscow, russia, in fact moscow is the city that is further away from the equator. moscow is on a latitude of 55.7558° north, while winnipeg is on a latitude of 49.8951° north, thus putting moscow by 5.8607° further away from the equator than winnipeg is.