Business, 23.03.2020 18:29 lujaynsparkles

A store has 5 years remaining on its lease in a mall. Rent is $1, 900 per month, 60 payments remain, and the next payment is due in 1 month. The mall's owner plans to sell the property in a year and wants rent at that time to be high so that the property will appear more valuable. Therefore, the store has been offered amiddot"great deal" (owner's words) on a new 5-year lease. The new lease calls for no rent for 9 months, then payments of $2, 700 per month for the next 51 months. The lease cannot be broken, and the store's WACC is 12% (or 1% per month)
a. Should the new lease be accepted?
b. If the store owner decided to bargain with the mall's owner over the new lease payment, what new lease payment would make the store owner indifferent between the new and the old leases? Round your answer to the nearest cent. Do not round your intermediate calculations. $
c. The store owner is not sure of the 12% WACC - it could be higher or lower. At what nominal WACC would the store owner be indifferent between the two leases? Do not round your intermediate calculations. %

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: Hali07

a) No, since the present value of new lease is more than old.

b) Detailed information about the explanation is shown below

c) At 39.80% nominal WACC

Explanation:

PV of old and new lease terms

Old Cash Flow New Cash Flow

0 0 0 0

1-9 - 1900 1-9 0

10-60 - 1900 10-60 2700

NPER 60 NPER 60

rate 1% rate 1%

PV ($85,414.57) PV ($98,250.36)

PV ( 1%, 60, 1900) PV ( 1%,9,- PV(1%,51, 2700))

Should the new lease be accepted? No, since the present value of new lease is more than old.

b) If the store owner decided to bargain with the mall's owner over the new lease payment, what new lease payment would make the store owner indifferent between the new and the old leases?

For this part pv of old lease should be equal to pv of new lease at t = 9

85414.57 × (1.01)⁹ 93416.657

Nper 51

Rate 1%

New lease amount ( $2,347.26)

PMT (1%, 51,93416.66)

Period Old Lease New Lease Change in lease

0 0 0 0

1-9 -1900 0 -1900

10-60 -1900 -2700 800

-1900

800

3.317% x 12 = 39.80%

IRR(Values 1:60)

The store owner is not sure of the 12% WACC - it could be higher or lower. At what nominal WACC would the store owner be indifferent between the two leases?

At 39.80% nominal WACC

Answer from: Quest

answer; ///i believe the correct two answer are (1) paid in capital; and (2) earned capital; good luck

Answer from: Quest

b $274.07

step-by-step explanation:

you just devide 222 by 0.81

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 19:50

Our uncle has $300,000 invested at 7.5%, and he now wants to retire. he wants to withdraw $35,000 at the end of each year, starting at the end of this year. he also wants to have $25,000 left to give you when he ceases to withdraw funds from the account. for how many years can he make the $35,000 withdrawals and still have $25,000 left in the end? a. 14.21b. 14.96c. 15.71d. 16.49e. 17.32

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 02:00

Create a list of five action verbs you might use on a job application to describe skills and/or work history. here are some examples: (organized, produced, selected, coordinated, contributed). find five other than the examples.

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 02:40

German brothels recently began offering a monthly subscription service for multiple purchasers. if you thought that the brothels' encouragement of prostitution was immoral to begin with, would you consider this pricing plan to be even more immoral? suppose a particular patron at a german brothel has the following willingness-to-pay schedule for services at the brothel, per session. session willingness to pay 1st $84 2nd $72 3rd $60 4th $48 5th $36 6th $24 suppose this consumer would not demand any more sessions, even for free. also assume that the marginal cost to the brothel, per session, is constant at $12. at a price of $78.00 per session, the number of sessions demanded by this consumer would be . at this price and quantity, consumer surplus is $ and producer surplus is $ . suppose the brothel has devised a new pricing scheme for consumers who demand more than 1 session. this pricing scheme is a subscription service, whereby consumers can pay a flat fee of $259.20 and can have up to 6 sessions total. using this subscription pricing model, this consumer would demand sessions. under this scenario, consumer surplus is $ and producer surplus is $ . (hint: for consumer surplus, consider how much total value the consumer places on all sessions, versus the total price paid.)

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 04:20

What common business mistake can cost you everything

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

A store has 5 years remaining on its lease in a mall. Rent is $1, 900 per month, 60 payments remain,...

Questions