subject
Business, 11.03.2020 19:07 angiechill

If the cross-price elasticity of demand for two goods is 1.25, then a. the two goods are luxuries. b. the two goods are substitutes. c. one of the goods is normal and the other good is inferior. d. the demand for one of the goods conforms to the law of demand, but the demand for the other good violates the law of demand.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 03:00
Sonic corp. manufactures ski and snowboarding equipment. it has estimated that this year there will be substantial growth in its sales during the winter months. it approaches the bank for credit. what is the purpose of such credit known as? a. expansion b. inventory building c. debt management d. emergency maintenance
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 03:30
Joe said “your speech was really great, i loved it.” his criticism lacks which component of effective feedback? a) he did not recognize his ethical obligations b) he did not focus on behavior c) he did not stress the positive d) he did not offer any specifics
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:50
In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:10
Match the terms with their correct definition. terms: 1. accounts receivable 2. other receivables 3 debtor 4. notes receivable 5. maturity date 6. creditor definitions: a. the party to a credit transaction who takes on an obligation/payable. b. the party who receives a receivable and will collect cash in the future. c. a written promise to pay a specified amount of money at a particular future date. d. the date when the note receivable is due. e. a miscellaneous category that includes any other type of receivable where there is a right to receive cash in the future. f. the right to receive cash in the future from customers for goods sold or for services performed.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
If the cross-price elasticity of demand for two goods is 1.25, then a. the two goods are luxuries. b...
Questions
question
English, 03.09.2020 08:01
question
Mathematics, 03.09.2020 08:01
question
English, 03.09.2020 08:01
question
Mathematics, 03.09.2020 08:01
question
Mathematics, 03.09.2020 08:01
Questions on the website: 13722363