Business, 26.02.2020 16:56 jenn8055

The following selected transactions were completed during August between Summit Co. and Beartooth Co.: Aug. 1 Summit Co. sold merchandise on account to Beartooth Co., $43,500, terms FOB destination, 2/15, n/eom. The cost of the merchandise sold was $29,330. 2 Summit Co. paid freight of $1,110 for delivery of merchandise sold to Beartooth Co. on August 1. 5 Summit Co. sold merchandise on account to Beartooth Co., $69,400, terms FOB shipping point, n/eom. The cost of the merchandise sold was $42,440. 9 Beartooth Co. paid freight of $2,310 on August 5 purchase from Summit Company. 15 Summit Co. sold merchandise on account to Beartooth Co., $61,000, terms FOB shipping point, 1/10, n/30. Summit Company paid freight of $1,555, which was added to the invoice. The cost of the merchandise sold was $37,780. 16 Beartooth Co. paid Summit Company for purchase of August 1. 20 Summit Company paid Beartooth Co. a refund of $1,800 for defective merchandise in the August 1 purchase. Beartooth Co. agreed to keep the merchandise. 25 Beartooth Co. paid Summit Company on account for purchase of August 15. 31 Summit Company granted a customer allowance (credit memo) to Beartooth Co. for $6,000 (invoiced amount) for merchandise that was returned from the August 1 purchase. The cost of the merchandise returned was $3,200. Required: Journalize the August transactions for (1) Summit Co. and (2) Beartooth Co. Refer to the Chart of Accounts of the appropriate company for exact wording of account titles.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 21.06.2019 19:00

Spirula trading inc sublets a part of its offices building to jade inc. for a period of ten years . where will the company disclose this information?

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 21.06.2019 20:30

Partnerships are the most common type of business firms in the world. t/f

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 21.06.2019 21:30

Gary becker's controversial the economics of discrimination concludes that price discrimination has no effect on final profits. price discrimination benefits monopolies. labor discrimination in hiring results in more efficient allocations of production. discrimination in hiring practices has no effect on final profits. labor discrimination harms firms that practice it due to increased labor costs. price discrimination harms monopolies, which refutes over two centuries of economic theory.

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 21.06.2019 21:30

Alandowner entered into a written agreement with a real estate broker whereby the broker would receive a commission of 10% of the sale price if he procured a "ready, willing, and able buyer" for the landowner's property and if the sale actually proceeded through closing. the broker found a buyer who agreed in writing to buy the property from the landowner for $100,000, the landowner's asking price. the buyer put up $6,000 as a down payment. the agreement between the landowner and the buyer contained a liquidated damages clause providing that, if the buyer defaulted by failing to tender the balance due of $94,000 at the closing date, damages would be 10% of the purchase price. the landowner included that clause because she was counting on using the proceeds of the sale for a business venture that would likely net her at least $10,000. the buyer became seriously ill and defaulted. when he recovered, he demanded that the landowner return his $6,000, and the landowner refused. the broker also demanded the $6,000 from the landowner and was refused. the broker and the buyer filed separate suits against the landowner, with the buyer pleading impossibility of performance. the two cases are consolidated into a single case. how should the court rule as to the disposition of the $6,000?

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

The following selected transactions were completed during August between Summit Co. and Beartooth Co...

Questions