Darnell lives in Dallas and runs a business that sells guitars. In an average year, he receives $704,000 from selling guitars. Of this sales revenue, he must pay the manufacturer a wholesale cost of $404,000; he also pays wages and utility bills totaling $286,000. He owns his showroom; if he chooses to rent it out, he will receive $3,000 in rent per year. Assume that the value of this showroom does not depreciate over the year. Also, if Darnell does not operate this guitar business, he can work as an accountant and receive an annual salary of $20,000 with no additional monetary costs. No other costs are incurred in running this guitar business. Identify each of Jake's costs given below as either an implicit cost or an explicit cost of selling guitars. 1. The wages and utility bills that Darnell pays. 2. The rental income Darnell could receive if he chose to rent out his showroom. 3. The salary Darnell could earn if he worked as a financial advisor. 4. The wholesale cost for the guitars that Darnell pays the manufacturer.

1. The wages and utility bills that Darnell pays.

286,000 explicit cost (accounting)

2. The rental income Darnell could receive if he chose to rent out his showroom.

3,000 x 12 months = 36,000 implicit cost (economic)

3. The salary Darnell could earn if he worked as a financial advisor.

20,000 implicit cost (economic)

4. The wholesale cost for the guitars that Darnell pays the manufacturer.

704,000 explicit cost (accounting)

Explanation:

The explicit cost are those which occurs and are represented in the accounting.

While the implicit cost represent the opportunity cost which is the best alternative rejected for taking the current course of action. They are considered for the economic profit

the answer is "b.the increased supply will create a surplus. "

the essential thought behind price controls is straightforward - utilize the power of law to modify the equilibrium of a market. for instance, the legislature may choose that the steel business needs to survive, and in this way pass a law to set a value floor on steel. this implies all steel sold must offer at or over the floor value, which must be set over the equilibrium cost for it to have any impact. the switch could likewise happen - the administration can choose that steel is excessively costly and set a value roof underneath its equilibrium value, with the goal that all steel must be sold at or beneath that ceiling.