Lena Holden began a professional practice on June 1 and plans to prepare financial statements at the end of each month. During June, Holden (the owner) completed these transactions

a. Owner invested $60,000 cash in the company along with equipment that had a $15,000 market value in exchange for its common stock.
b. The company paid $1,500 cash for rent of office space for the month.
c. The company purchased $10,000 of additional equipment on credit (payment due within 30 days).
d. The company completed work for a client and immediately collected the $2,500 cash earned.
e. The company completed work for a client and sent a bill for $8,000 to be received within 30 days.
f. The company purchased additional equipment for $6,000 cash.
g. The company paid an assistant $3,000 cash as wages for the month.
h. The company collected $5,000 cash as a partial payment for the amount owed by the client in transaction e.

i. The company paid $10,000 cash to settle the liability created in transaction c.
j. The company paid $1,000 cash in dividends to the owner (sole shareholder.

Enter the impact of each transaction on individual items of the accounting equation.

ASSETS=LIABILITIES+EQUITY

75,000  =                  +  75,000

(1,500)=                  +  (1,500)

10,000  =    10,000  +

2,500  =                  +  2,500

8,000  =                  +  8,000

-          =                  +

(3,000)=                  +  (3,000)

 -          =                  +

(10,000)=  (10,000)         +

(1,000)=                  +  (1,000)

80,000  =     0           +  80,000

Explanation:

Accounting equation is the foundation of dual entry bookkeeping  system. It is also known as the balance sheet equation that shows the relationship between ASSSETS, LIABILITIES AND EQUITY. Total assets must be equal to total liabilities + Equity due to the dual entry system otherwise, it is an indication of descrepancy in during the recording.

answermeasured by how well she or he does the job'; /

the answer is "b.the increased supply will create a surplus. "

the essential thought behind price controls is straightforward - utilize the power of law to modify the equilibrium of a market. for instance, the legislature may choose that the steel business needs to survive, and in this way pass a law to set a value floor on steel. this implies all steel sold must offer at or over the floor value, which must be set over the equilibrium cost for it to have any impact. the switch could likewise happen - the administration can choose that steel is excessively costly and set a value roof underneath its equilibrium value, with the goal that all steel must be sold at or beneath that ceiling.