There are 100 voters and three alternative restaurants: Dylan’s Pizza, Elise’s Thai, and Frank’s Fish. In Situation 1, the individual preference lists are as follows:

Voters 1-49: Dylan’s Pizza, Frank’s Fish, Elise’s Thai

Voters 50-75: Elise’s Thai, Dylan’s Pizza, Frank’s Fish

Voters 76-100: Frank’s Fish, Elise’s Thai, Dylan’s Pizza

In Situation 2, the individual preference lists are as follows:

Voters 1-47: Dylan’s Pizza, Frank’s Fish, Elise’s Thai

Voters 48-49: Frank’s Fish, Dylan’s Pizza, Elise’s Thai

Voters 50-75: Elise’s Thai, Dylan’s Pizza, Frank’s Fish

Voters 76-100: Frank’s Fish, Elise’s Thai, Dylan’s Pizza

We can also use those two situations to demonstrate which of the following statements?

Group of answer choices:

1 The Condorcet procedure fails to satisfy the monotonicity property.
2 The Borda count procedure fails to satisfy the monotonicity property.
3 The Condorcet procedure fails to satisfy the Always a Winner property.
4 Plurality voting fails to satisfy the Condorcet winner property.
5 The Hare (instant runoff) system fails to satisfy the Always a Winner property.