subject
Business, 03.02.2020 23:48 calmicaela12s

You are a rookie police officer and are riding with a field training officer (fto). during your shift the fto stops at a convenience store and quickly drinks four beers in the back room of the store. he is visibly affected by the beers and the smell of alcohol is very noticeable. what should you do? what if the fto had just written a favorable evaluation of you even though you should have received a reprimand for an improper disposition of a traffic accident?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:20
According to the u.s. census bureau (), the median household income in the united states was $23,618 in 1985, $34,076 in 1995, $46,326 in 2005, and $57,230 in 2015. in purchasing power terms, how did family income compare in each of those four years? you will need to know that the cpi (multiplied by 100, 1982–1984 = 100) was 107.6 in 1985, 152.4 in 1995, 195.3 in 2005, and 237.0 in 2015
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 22:30
Suppose that each country completely specializes in the production of the good in which it has a comparative advantage, producing only that good. in this case, the country that produces jeans will produce million pairs per week, and the country that produces corn will produce million bushels per week.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 11:00
Jessica thinks that everyone would be better off if financial institutions stopped issuing credit. which statement accurately supports her argument? people would pay less in interest fees. people would have greater protection in case of emergencies. people would need to save for many years to buy a home or open a business. people would support the economy through purchases of more goods and services.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 17:30
Why is the cournot equilibrium an​ equilibrium? a. there are​ short-run barriers to exit in a cournot​ duopoly, so both firms cannot alter their output levels. b. given the other​ firm's level of​ production, both firms are maximizing profits and cannot improve their situation by unilaterally altering their level of output. c. both firms operate at zero profit under a cournot​ equilibrium, so they would face negative profits if they change output. d. both firms operate at minimum​ long-run average cost under a cournot​ equilibrium, so changes to output would reduce​ long-run profits. even if they​ can't collude, why​ don't firms set their outputs at the joint​ profit-maximizing levels​ (i.e., the levels they would have chosen had they​ colluded)? a. given that other firm produces at the collusive​ level, a firm could increase their own profits by increasing output above the collusive level. b. the midpoint of the collusion curve​ (i.e., the collusive​ outcome) lies below the reaction​ curves, so both firms have an incentive to increase output under the cournot duopoly. c. both a and b are correct d. both a and b are incorrect
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
You are a rookie police officer and are riding with a field training officer (fto). during your shif...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363