subject
Business, 23.01.2020 20:31 kandicelima01

Sam gerard entered into a contract for rim country landscaping to install landscaping, sprinklers, and lighting on his cabin lot. the $10,000 contract called for 3 spruce pine trees, 6 quaking aspen trees, and 18 shrubs of varying types and colors. when rim country finished the landscaping, there were 3 evergreen pine trees, 6 red plum trees, and 12 shrubs. the sprinklers did not turn on because rim country lost the solar timing mechanisms. the lighting was defective and rotated on and off all day and all night. sam refused to pay rim country until the correct trees were put in and the lighting and sprinkler systems worked. which of the following statements is correct? 1. sam need not pay because rim country did not complete the work as required, and the systems were not working.2. sam will have to pay because the contract was substantially performed.3. rim country is entitled to compensation for the work done even though it was incorrect and not working.4. rim country is entitled to payment under the doctrine of substantial performance.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 08:20
Suppose that jim plans to borrow money for an education at texas a& m university. jim will need to borrow $25,000 at the end of each year for the next five years (total=$125,000). jim wishes his parents could pay for his education but they can’t. at least, he qualifies for government loans with a reduced interest rate while he is in school. he has a special arrangement with aggiebank to lend him the money at a subsidized rate of 1% over five years without having to make a payment until the end of the fifth year. however, at the end of the fifth year, jim agrees to pay off the loan by borrowing from longhorn bank. longhorn bank will lend him the money he needs at an annual interest rate of 6%. jim agrees to pay back the longhorn bank with 20 annual payments and the payments will be uniform (equal annual payments including principal and interest). (i) calculate how much money jim has to borrow at the end of 5 years to pay off the loan with aggiebank. a. $121,336 b. $127,525 c. $125,000 d. $102,020 e. none of the above
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:30
Suppose you win a small lottery and have the choice of two ways to be paid: you can accept the money in a lump sum or in a series of payments over time. if you pick the lump sum, you get $2,950 today. if you pick payments over time, you get three payments: $1,000 today, $1,000 1 year from today, and $1,000 2 years from today. 1) at an interest rate of 6% per year, the winner would be better off accepting the (lump sum / payments over time), since it has the greater present value. 2) at an interest rate of 9% per year, the winner would be better off accepting the (lump sum / payments over time), since it has the greater present value. 3) years after you win the lottery, a friend in another country calls to ask your advice. by wild coincidence, she has just won another lottery with the same payout schemes. she must make a quick decision about whether to collect her money under the lump sum or the payments over time. what is the best advice to give your friend? a) the lump sum is always better. b) the payments over time are always better. c) it will depend on the interest rate; advise her to get a calculator. d) none of these answers is good advice.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 13:30
Presented below is information for annie company for the month of march 2018. cost of goods sold $245,000 rent expense $ 36,000 freight-out 7,000 sales discounts 8,000 insurance expense 5,000 sales returns and allowances 11,000 salaries and wages expense 63,000 sales revenue 410,000 instructions prepare the income statement.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:00
Kendra knight took part in a friendly game of touch football. she had played before and was familiar with football. michael jewett was on her team. in the course of play, michael bumped into kendra and knocked her to the ground. he stepped on her hand, causing injury to a little finger that later required its amputation. she sued michael for damages. he defended on the ground that she had assumed the risk. kendra claimed that assumption of risk could not be raised as a defense because the state legislature had adopted the standard of comparative negligence. what happens if contributory negligence applies? what happens if the defense of comparative negligence applies?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Sam gerard entered into a contract for rim country landscaping to install landscaping, sprinklers, a...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722361