Positive technological change in the production of lcd televisions caused the price of lcd televisions to fall. holding everything else constant, how would this affect the market for blu-ray players (a complement to lcd televisions)?

a. the demand for blu-ray players would increase and the equilibrium price of blu-ray players would increase.
b. the demand for blu-ray players would increase and the equilibrium price of blu-ray players would decrease.
c. the demand for blu-ray players would decrease because consumers could afford to buy fewer lcd televisions and blu-ray players.
d. the supply of blu-ray players would increase and the equilibrium price of blu-ray players would decrease.

142"what is the value of n? soefon11402bebe99918+19: 00esseeshop60-990 0esle

The basic difference between macroeconomics and microeconomics is that: a. microeconomics looks at the forest (aggregate markets) while macroeconomics looks at the trees (individual markets). b. macroeconomics is concerned with groups of individuals while microeconomics is concerned with single countries. c. microeconomics is concerned with the trees (individual markets) while macroeconomics is concerned with the forest (aggregate markets). d. macroeconomics is concerned with generalization while microeconomics is concerned with specialization.

David burdick is the ceo of acme bubblegum, a successful public company. as one of the cofounders of the company, burdick has enjoyed speaking and writing about the success of acme bubblegum for several years. typically, he speaks at conferences or directly to the press, but recently, he has been blogging about his firm anonymously. specifically, he defended a recent advertising campaign that was unpopular among consumers and pointedly attacked one of acme bubblegum’s competitors. burdick deeply enjoys his anonymous blogging and believes that none of his readers actually know that he works for acme bubblegum.should burdick be allowed to praise his company’s performance anonymously online? should he be allowed to attack his competitors without disclosing his relationship with the company? how would you feel if the ceo of a company at which you shopped was secretly writing criticisms of his or her competition? how would you feel if you knew a writer for your favorite blog was actually closely involved in a company that the blog discussed? 1. define the ethical issue? 2. who are the primary stakeholders? 3. what are the possible alternatives? 4. how could you evaluate the ethical implications of the alternative actions (use appropriate decision rules)? 5. what action would you recommend and why?