subject
Business, 20.01.2020 17:31 catman7884

If lorenzo stands up at a concert he can see the performance better. he therefore concludes if everyone stood up, everyone could see the performance better. which of the following best characterizes the statement? a. the statement violates the ceteris paribus condition. b. the statement presents the fallacy of composition. c. the statement ignores secondary effects. d. the statement demonstrates that association is not causation.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 17:30
You want to paint your room yellow, so you get some samples at the paint store. when you hold the sample against your white wall, it looks different from the way it looks against the green curtain. a psychologist would attribute this to perceptual constancy. visual paradoxes. contrast effects. threshold differences.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 21.06.2019 22:00
Email viruses are typically launched by people who modify header information to hide their identity. brightmail's enrique salem says that in the future, your email reader will authenticate the sender before putting hte message in your inbox. that way, you will know the source of all the emails you read. alan nugent of novell says, "i'm kind of a fan of eliminating anonymity if that is the price for security." will eliminating anonymity make computers more secure?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:30
Mai and chuck have been divorced since 2012. they have three boys, ages 6, 8, and 10. all of the boys live with mai and she receives child support from chuck. mai and chuck both work and the boys need child care before and after school. te boys attend the fun house day care center and mai paid them $2,000 and chuck paid them $3,000. mai's agi is $18,000 and chuck's is $29,000. mai will claim two of the boys as dependents. she signed form 8332 which allows chuck to claim one of the boys. who can take the child and dependent care credit?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 13:00
Reliability and validity reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. in the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways. unfortunately, being consistent in measurement does not necessarily mean that you have measured something correctly. to illustrate this concept, consider a kitchen scale that would be used to measure the weight of cereal that you eat in the morning. if the scale is not properly calibrated, it may consistently under- or overestimate the amount of cereal that’s being measured. while the scale is highly reliable in producing consistent results (e.g., the same amount of cereal poured onto the scale produces the same reading each time), those results are incorrect. this is where validity comes into play. validity refers to the extent to which a given instrument or tool accurately measures what it’s supposed to measure. while any valid measure is by necessity reliable, the reverse is not necessarily true. researchers strive to use instruments that are both highly reliable and valid.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
If lorenzo stands up at a concert he can see the performance better. he therefore concludes if every...
Questions
question
Computers and Technology, 29.01.2020 00:54
question
History, 29.01.2020 00:54
question
French, 29.01.2020 00:54
question
English, 29.01.2020 00:54
question
English, 29.01.2020 00:54
question
Mathematics, 29.01.2020 00:54
Questions on the website: 13722367