A. jose's opportunity cost of producing and consuming one more orange is 2 melons. b. alex's opportunity cost of producing and consuming one more orange is 2/3 melon. c. alex's opportunity cost of producing and consuming one more orange is 4,000 melons.
d. jose's opportunity cost of producing and consuming one more orange is 1/2 melon.

Western electric has 32,000 shares of common stock outstanding at a price per share of $79 and a rate of return of 13.00 percent. the firm has 7,300 shares of 7.80 percent preferred stock outstanding at a price of $95.00 per share. the preferred stock has a par value of $100. the outstanding debt has a total face value of $404,000 and currently sells for 111 percent of face. the yield to maturity on the debt is 8.08 percent. what is the firm's weighted average cost of capital if the tax rate is 39 percent?

Which statement was true in the past but is not generally true today? a. the training and education costs for some jobs will prohibit some people from entering that career be b. young people tend to go into the same job that their parents and grandparents did see c. people need a basic level of education before they meet requirements to professional schools d. people will probably have more than one job in their active working lives

How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.