Potvinpotvin self storage purchased land, paying $ 165 comma 000$165,000 cash as a down payment and signing a $ 175 comma 000$175,000 note payable for the balance. potvinpotvin also had to pay delinquent property tax of $ 5 comma 000$5,000, title insurance costing $ 4 comma 000$4,000, and $ 2 comma 000$2,000 to level the land and remove an unwanted building. the company paid $ 55 comma 000$55,000 to add soil for the foundation and then constructed an office building at a cost of $ 900 comma 000$900,000. it also paid $ 52 comma 000$52,000 for a fence around the property, $ 16 comma 000$16,000 for the company sign near the property entrance, and $ 6 comma 000$6,000 for lighting of the grounds.

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?