Your project to obtain charitable donations is now 41 days into a planned 51-day project. the project is divided into 3 activities. the first activity is designed to solicit individual donations. it is scheduled to run the first 34 days of the project and to bring in $25,700. even though we are 41 days into the project, we still see that we have only 90% of this activity complete. the second activity relates to company donations and is scheduled to run for 41 days starting on day 7 and extending through day 48. we estimate that even though we should have (34/41) 83% of this activity complete, it is actually only 54% complete. this part of the project was scheduled to bring in $150,700 in donations. the final activity is for matching funds. this activity is scheduled to run the last 10 days of the project and has not started. it is scheduled to bring in an additional $51,400. so far $178,000 has actually been brought in on the project. calculate the schedule variance, schedule performance index, cost variance and cost (actually value in this case) performance index. (negative values should be indicated by a minus sign. do not round intermediate calculations. round your dollar amounts to the nearest whole number. round your "performance index" values to 3 decimal places.)

Ursus, inc., is considering a project that would have a five-year life and would require a $1,650,000 investment in equipment. at the end of five years, the project would terminate and the equipment would have no salvage value. the project would provide net operating income each year as follows (ignore income taxes.):

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.

The cook corporation has two divisions--east and west. the divisions have the following revenues and expenses: east westsales $ 603,000 $ 506,000 variable costs 231,000 300,000 traceable fixed costs 151,500 192,000 allocated common corporate costs 128,600 156,000 net operating income (loss) $ 91,900 $ (142,000 )the management of cook is considering the elimination of the west division. if the west division were eliminated, its traceable fixed costs could be avoided. total common corporate costs would be unaffected by this decision. given these data, the elimination of the west division would result in an overall company net operating income (loss) of: multiple choice$91,900$(64,100)$(142,000)$(50,100)