On july 15, 2018, ortiz & co. signed a contract to provide everfresh bakery with aningredient-weighing system for a price of $90,000. the system included finely tuned scales thatfit into everfresh's automated assembly line, ortiz's proprietary software modified to allow theweighing system to function in everfresh's automated system, and a one-year contract tocalibrate the equipment and software on an as-needed basis. (ortiz competes with other vendorswho offer ongoing calibration contracts for ortiz's systems.) if ortiz was to provide these goodsor services separately, it would charge $60,000 for the scales, $10,000 for the software, and$30,000 for the calibration contract. ortiz delivered and installed the equipment and software onaugust 1, 2018, and the calibration service commenced on that date. assume that the scales, software and calibration service are viewed as one performanceobligation. how much revenue will ortiz recognize in 2018 for this contract?

David burdick is the ceo of acme bubblegum, a successful public company. as one of the cofounders of the company, burdick has enjoyed speaking and writing about the success of acme bubblegum for several years. typically, he speaks at conferences or directly to the press, but recently, he has been blogging about his firm anonymously. specifically, he defended a recent advertising campaign that was unpopular among consumers and pointedly attacked one of acme bubblegum’s competitors. burdick deeply enjoys his anonymous blogging and believes that none of his readers actually know that he works for acme bubblegum.should burdick be allowed to praise his company’s performance anonymously online? should he be allowed to attack his competitors without disclosing his relationship with the company? how would you feel if the ceo of a company at which you shopped was secretly writing criticisms of his or her competition? how would you feel if you knew a writer for your favorite blog was actually closely involved in a company that the blog discussed? 1. define the ethical issue? 2. who are the primary stakeholders? 3. what are the possible alternatives? 4. how could you evaluate the ethical implications of the alternative actions (use appropriate decision rules)? 5. what action would you recommend and why?