Unlike an arbitrator, a mediator question 19 options: a) cannot be chosen by the disputing parties b) can only be appointed by the supreme court c) cannot impose a binding solution on the disputing parties d) can impose a binding solution only on any one of the disputing parties e) is not a neutral party

The correct option is C

Explanation:

Mediator is the neutral party who tries to solve the dispute through making a healthy and good communication among the disputed parties so that the parties could understand each other and as a outcome resolve the issue.

Arbitrator is a system which is formal and the disputes solution, whole process run by court. So, an arbitrator could impose a binding solution on the disputing parties whereas mediator could not choose this option.

answer; blank(1); autonomous; blank(2) a wlan controller-based architecture;