The united kingdom started regulating the size of grocery stores in the early 1990s, and today, the average size of a typical uk grocery store is roughly half the size of a typical u. s. store andtwo-thirds the size of a typical french store (haskel and sadun, 2011).  

what implications would such a restriction on size have on astore's average costs. discuss in terms of economics of scale and scope.

a. grocery store size does not affect the long-run average cost of production if there are economies of scale.

b. the long-run average cost of production for u. k. grocery stores is lower if there are no economies of scale.

c. the long-run average cost of production for u. k. grocery stores is lower if there are diseconomics of scale.

d. the long-run average cost of production for u. k. grocery stores is higher if there are diseconomics of scale.

C. The long-run average cost of production for U.K. grocery stores is lower if there are diseconomics of scale.

Explanation:

The diseconomy of scale is called the effect that occurs in the costs of a given production. These effects generate increasing costs for the company for each unit of product that is manufactured. Specifically and technically, a diseconomy of scale occurs when a percentage increase in production is less than the percentage increase in inputs.

Since the size of the grocery stores decreases, the average costs decreases. So, The long-run average cost of production is lower when there are diseconomics of scale.

Hope this helps.

answer: potomac gold & silver jewelry sells the cheapest make me brainliest and i will be your freind

explanation:

there was no passage listed but using the process of elimination i'd say it was d. the high economy would do the opposite. i don't see how low prices would affect it. high unemployment is possible but i feel d is the better answer.