In what way do motion picture music licensing differ between the united states and europe? a) a synchronization license is not required for playing in u. s. theaters. b) a performance license is not required for playing in u. s. theaters. c) european theaters pay for a blanket performance license. d) european theaters pay only for a mechanical license.

Motion picture music licensing differ between the United States and Europe because (B) A performance license is not required for playing in U.S. theaters.

Explanation:

Each nation has its very own understandings of licensed innovation and the rights that they think about reasonable and equivalent. The United States and Europe specifically, have changed wellsprings of sovereignties and diverse accumulation social orders as well. In Europe, a similar arrangement of rights is offered, with a couple of augmentations: For instance, in the 1961 marking of the Rome Convention, neighboring rights were presented.

In the United States, distributing organizations manage mechanical eminences and the authoritative parts of an essayist's profession.  A public performance license is a music usage contract with the holder of a patented work (album) that allows right to play the track in general.

e would be the answer

apex verified answer < 3

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : d. choose to : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

i really hope this < 3 < 3 < 3