subject
Business, 18.10.2019 18:10 lilakatedancer

Mouth-waterin' treats company wants to sell its candy in a normal-sized package labeled "gigantic size." nufabrics, inc., wants to advertise its sweaters as having "that wool feel," but does not want to specify on labels that the sweat-ers are 100 percent polyester. can these firms market their products as they would like? if not, why not?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 08:20
Suppose that jim plans to borrow money for an education at texas a& m university. jim will need to borrow $25,000 at the end of each year for the next five years (total=$125,000). jim wishes his parents could pay for his education but they can’t. at least, he qualifies for government loans with a reduced interest rate while he is in school. he has a special arrangement with aggiebank to lend him the money at a subsidized rate of 1% over five years without having to make a payment until the end of the fifth year. however, at the end of the fifth year, jim agrees to pay off the loan by borrowing from longhorn bank. longhorn bank will lend him the money he needs at an annual interest rate of 6%. jim agrees to pay back the longhorn bank with 20 annual payments and the payments will be uniform (equal annual payments including principal and interest). (i) calculate how much money jim has to borrow at the end of 5 years to pay off the loan with aggiebank. a. $121,336 b. $127,525 c. $125,000 d. $102,020 e. none of the above
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 10:10
Ursus, inc., is considering a project that would have a five-year life and would require a $1,650,000 investment in equipment. at the end of five years, the project would terminate and the equipment would have no salvage value. the project would provide net operating income each year as follows (ignore income taxes.):
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 16:00
In macroeconomics, to study the aggregate means to study blank
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 18:00
David paid $975,000 for two beachfront lots in coastal south carolina, with the intention of building residential homes on each. two years later, the south carolina legislature passed the beachfront management act, barring any further development of the coast, including david's lots. when david files a complaint to seek compensation for his property, south carolina refuses, pointing to a passage in david's own complaint that states "the beachfront management act [was] properly and validly designed to south carolina's " is south carolina required to compensate david under the takings clause?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Mouth-waterin' treats company wants to sell its candy in a normal-sized package labeled "gigantic si...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 17.03.2020 04:23
Questions on the website: 13722362