Charles lackey operates a bakery in idaho falls, idaho. because of its excellent product and excellent location, demand has increased by 25% in the last year. on far too many occasions, customers have not been able to purchase the bread of their choice. because of the size of the store, no new ovens can be added. at a staff meeting, one employee suggested ways to load the ovens differently so that more loaves of bread can be baked at one time. this new process will require that the ovens be loaded by hand, requiring additional manpower. this is the only production change that will be made in order to meet the increased demand. the bakery currently makes 1 comma 500 loaves per month. employees are paid $8 per hour. in addition to the labor cost, charles also has a constant utility cost per month of $500 and a per loaf ingredient cost of $0.35. current multifactor productivity for 640 work hours per month = 0.244 0.244 loaves/dollar (round your response to three decimal places). after increasing the number of work hours to 800 per month, the multifactor productivity = 0.2024453 0.248 loaves/dollar (round your response to three decimal places). the percentage increase in productivity = 4 nothing% (enter your response as a percentage rounded to two decimal places).

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.