Janet pulls her car into a line for a car wash. janet says nothing and her car is washed by the employees there. janet then refuses to pay for the car wash, stating that there is no contract. what would the results be in a lawsuit over this situation?
a. janet wins; because she said nothing, there can be no contract.
b. car wash wins; this is an express, unilateral contract that has been accepted.
c. janet wins; because the car wash made no promise to wash her car, there is no contract.
d. car wash wins; this is an implied-in-fact contract that has been accepted.

B. Car wash wins; this is an express, unilateral contract that has been accepted.

Explanation:

According to my research on different judicial cases and laws, I can say that in this situation the car wash wins since this is an express, unilateral contract that has been accepted. This unilateral contract is accepted by both parties when Janet got into the car wash line at a Car Washing business.  Therefore Janet had no defense in this lawsuit.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .

a and c

explanation:

answer is a

explanation: