subject
Business, 07.08.2019 02:10 abbypark0804

Acontract does not exist for purposes of applying the revenue recognition principle in all of the following cases except for when: a. the seller believes it is not probable that it will collect the amount it's entitled to receive under the contractb. the seller and buyer did not sign a formalized written contractc. the seller and buyer can terminate the contract without penalty and neither has performed any obligations under the contract. d. the seller believes it is highly likely but not certain that the buyer will agree to the terms of the contract.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 06:00
According to herman, one of the differences of managing a nonprofit versus a for-profit corporation is
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 03:00
If big macs were a durable good that could be costlessly transported between countries, which of the following would present an arbitrage opportunity? check all that apply. exporting big macs from argentina to the united states. exporting big macs from the united kingdom to poland. exporting big macs from switzerland to china
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 08:30
The kamp family has twins, rob and rachel. both rob and rachel graduated from college 2 years ago, and each is now earning $50,000 per year. rachel works in the retail industry, where the mean salary for executives with less than 5 years' experience is $35,000 with a standard deviation of $8,000. rob is an engineer. the mean salary for engineers with less than 5 years' experience is $60,000 with a standard deviation of $5,000.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 23.06.2019 11:20
In march 2012, the state of california started requiring that all packaging for food and drink with the additive 4-methylimidazole (4-mi) be clearly labeled with a cancer warning. because of this, both pepsi and coke changed their formula to eliminate 4-mi as an ingredient. if pepsi and coke did not change their formula, holding all else constant, what would have happened to the demand for these goods, assuming pepsi and coke were in a competitive market? a. the demand curve for both pepsi and coke would have shifted to the right, causing the price of both products to decrease and the profits for the companies to fall. b. the demand curve for pepsi and coke would have remained unchanged, but the price of both products would have decreased and the profits for the companies would have fallen. c. the demand curve for pepsi and coke would have decreased, but the prices and profits would not have changed. d. the demand curve for only one of them would change because pepsi and coke are substitutes. e. the demand curve for pepsi and coke would have shifted to the left, causing the price of both products to decrease and the profits for both companies to fall.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Acontract does not exist for purposes of applying the revenue recognition principle in all of the fo...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 18.11.2020 19:00
question
Mathematics, 18.11.2020 19:00
question
English, 18.11.2020 19:00
Questions on the website: 13722363