subject
Business, 06.08.2019 04:30 Tok

Bruno’s stock should return 14 percent in a boom, 11 percent in a normal economy, and 4 percent in a recession. the probabilities of a boom, normal economy, and recession are 8 percent, 90 percent, and 2 percent, respectively. what is the variance of the returns on this stock?
a. 0.011387
b. 0.000169
c. 0.001506
d. 0.001538
e. 0.011561

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 16:10
You are at a holiday dinner with your family. your relative makes the argument that the u.s. economy is resurgent and has recovered from the great recession of 2007 – 2009. economic growth, as measured by gdp, has been increasing from one quarter to the next. you beg to differ. how would you structure your argument with your relative? hint: you should think about two things, the accuracy of gdp measures, and whether gdp should be considered a comprehensive measure of a countries well-being.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 21.06.2019 19:20
Anderson, a computer engineer, and spouse, who is unemployed, provide more than half of the support for their child, age 23, who is a full-time student and who earns $7,000. they also provide more than half of the support for their older child, age 33, who earns $2,000 during the year. how many dependents may the andersons claim on their joint tax return?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:50
In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:10
Which feature is a characteristic of a corporation?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Bruno’s stock should return 14 percent in a boom, 11 percent in a normal economy, and 4 percent in a...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 03.12.2020 22:20
Questions on the website: 13722360