Business, 10.07.2019 03:20 emalvidrez5205

An accident has occurred, causing $10,000 in harm to the victim. the amount of harm done is undisputed and easy to prove; punitive damages are not applicable, so any damage award would be for exactly $10,000.
this type of accident is governed by strict liability, so the injurer is legally responsible, but it may be difficult to prove in court that he caused the harm. the victim can hire a lawyer for $3,000 and go to trial, in which case he would have a 40% chance of winning. he could also hire an expert witness to testify. this would ensure victory at trial, but would cost an additional $10,000, for a total of $13,000. going to trial costs the defendant (injurer) $5,000, regardless of whether the plaintiff (victim) hires an expert witness. assume that neither party pays any legal expenses if an out-of-court settlement is reached. first, consider the usual american rule where each party pays its own legal fees.
(a) if the case goes to trial, will the plaintiff hire an expert witness or not?
(b) given your answer to (a), calculate: i. each party’s threat point during pre-trial negotiations (which is its noncooperative payoff if the case goes to trial). ii. the gains from cooperation if a pre-trial settlement is reached. iii. the settlement that would occur if the two parties agreed to divide the gains from cooperation evenly
(c) in this scenario, would the american rule lead to over-, under-, or efficient precaution on the part of the injurer?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 10:00

In a chapter 7 bankruptcy, a debtor:

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 12:40

When cell phones were first entering the market, they were relatively large and reception was undependable. all cell phones were essentially the same. but as the technology developed, many competitors entered, introducing features unique to their phones. today, cell phones are only a small fraction of the size and weight of their predecessors. consumers can buy cell phones with color screens, cameras, internet access, daily planners, or voice activation (and any combination of these features). the history of the cell phone demonstrates what marketing trend?

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 14:10

When paul o’neill joined alcoa as ceo, he set a , that there would be zero workplace accidents. a lot of people in the organization thought this was impossible given how dangerous some aluminum-manufacturing jobs are, but alcoa’s safety record improved tremendously. as the board of governors of the american red cross considers planning, one option is to make strategic plans and then direct managers to align tactical and operational plans accordingly. another option is to have planning specialists managers across the organization make their own plans. why might this organization’s executives opt for the latter approach? check all that apply. (a) the environment is a dynamic one, and department and frontline managers can come up with more responsive plans than can central leadership. (b)resources will be better coordinated across the organization in support of the overall strategy.(c) senior leadership will have more control over the organization’s direction. (d)when managers come up with their own plans, they are likely to be more committed to following through on them.

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 16:40

Determining effects of stock splits oracle corp has had the following stock splits since its inception. effective date split amount october 12, 2000 2 for 1 january 18, 2000 2 for 1 february 26, 1999 3 for 2 august 15, 1997 3 for 2 april 16, 1996 3 for 2 february 22, 1995 3 for 2 november 8, 1993 2 for 1 june 16,1989 2 for 1 december 21, 1987 2 for 1 march 9, 1987 2 for 1 a. if the par value of oracle shares was originally $2, what would oracle corp. report as par value per share on its 2015 balance sheet? compute the revised par value after each stock split. round answers to three decimal places.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

An accident has occurred, causing $10,000 in harm to the victim. the amount of harm done is undisput...

Questions