subject
Business, 23.06.2019 01:40 ijohnh14

The new york times (nov. 30, 1993) reported that “the inability of opec to agree last week to cut production has sent the oil market into turmoil . . [leading to] the lowest price for domestic crude oil since june 1990.” why were the members of opec trying to agree to cut production? so they could save more oil for future consumption so they could lower the price so they could raise the price why do you suppose opec was unable to agree on cutting production? because each country has a different production capacity because each country experiences different production costs because each country has an incentive to cheat on any agreement the newspaper also noted opec’s view “that producing nations outside the organization, like norway and britain, should do their share and cut production.” what does the phrase “do their share” suggest about opec’s desired relationship with norway and britain? opec would like norway and britain to keep their production levels high. opec would like norway and britain to act competitively. opec would like norway and britain to join the cartel.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 20:20
while setting up his new office, an attorney ordered thick, frieze carpets for the floor. however, the building inspector had him remove the expensive carpeting. the building inspector stated that according to federal regulations, the office must be wheelchair accessible as it is a public area. he further explained that since wheelchairs do not maneuver well in thick, frieze carpeting, the carpets had to be removed and be replaced with smooth-textured carpets that do not restrict wheelchair maneuverability. this scenario illustrates how a company is influenced by the component of its specific environment.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:00
Which motion below could be made so that the chair would be called on to enforce a violated rule?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:20
Why is it easier for new entrants to get involved in radical innovations when compared to incumbent firms? a. unlike incumbent firms, new entrants do not have to face the high entry barriers, initially. b. new entrants are embedded in an innovation ecosystem, while incumbent firms are not. c. unlike incumbent firms, new entrants do not have formal organizational structures and processes. d. incumbent firms do not have the advantages of network effects that new entrants have.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 22:20
Who owns a renter-occupied apartment? a. the government b. a landlord c. the resident d. a cooperative
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The new york times (nov. 30, 1993) reported that “the inability of opec to agree last week to cut pr...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 05.08.2019 00:20
question
Biology, 05.08.2019 00:20
Questions on the website: 13722367