Northwest energy company is subject to mandatory workers' compensation laws in the states in which it does business. odele and work for northwest energy as part of a crew that travels to remote locations to repair broken pumps and other damaged equipment. at a distant site, odele is injured in an accident that is entirely 's fault. odele files a claim for workers' compensation. should the claim be granted? what would be northwest energy's best defense against it?

The claim should be granted because the two elements (employment relationship and accidental injury on the job) have been met. Because those 2 things have occurred, who is at fault does not matter. Northwest Energy's best defense would be if they could prove either of the 2 elements did not exist at the time of the accident/

c.

explanation:

regressive tax taxes the poor and less of the wealthy. this the rich get richer and the poor get more poor. this would create a large wealth gap.

answer; the above statement/question is ( true);