Match the job titles with the career clusters

How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.

Why do you think researchers chose to begin with cigarette smokers opposed to other types of addiction ?

How does a bond differ from a stock? select all that apply. a bond is issued for a certain amount, while a stock is a small part of ownership in a company a bond is usually issued by a government, while a stock by a public for profit company a bond is something you keep forever, while a stock you can buy and sell whenever you want a bondholder receives interest from the bond-issuer, while a stock holder receives nothing until they sell the stock a bond is considered a safer investment, while a stock is considered riskier