Paulo makes the argument that the asteroid strike that likely contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs was a short-tem environmental change because it happened so quickly. which is the best analysis of paulo’s position? he is correct; it happened in just a few seconds. he is correct; it did not cause any long-term changes. he is incorrect; it caused long-term changes. he is incorrect; impacts are not environmental changes.

He is incorrect, it caused long-term changes.

Explanation:

A short term change is the one which exert a small impact over the environment which could be recover soon. Like drought, volcanic eruption, and pollution. A long term change is the one which exert a large and drastic impact over the environment which either does not recover or takes long time to recover.

The extinction of dinosaur due to asteroid strike is a long-term change because it has wiped large diversity of dinosaurs from earth. This loss was not compensated.

what have scientists found to be the most efficient and effective way to insert new sequences into an individual? a-scientists have created genetically altered foods that release dna during digestion. b-scientists use viruses to insert specific gene sequences. c-scientists irradiate genes so that they can be absorbed through the skin.

bc blah

explanation:

bc blah