Which of the following could be illegal?
a. not petting and interacting with an animal
b. euthanizing a healthy animal
c. not providing an animal with food and water
d. performing medically unnecessary surgery on an animal
im taking veterinary technology, i didnt know what subject this should be in, sorry if its in the wrong subject. by the way i was pretty sure b was the right answer but in my opinion, b, c, and d seems cruel and should be illegal.

Its definitely C although the other options may seem cruel there still legal that's just the world we live in. Think about it a lot of people don't interact with there pets may seem bad but its not illegal. But you can be sure that if you don't feed your pet you can get in real trouble for neglection.

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."

the answer is b.) hydrogen bonds between bases.