If huntington's disease is due to a dominant trait, shouldn't three-fourths of the population have huntington's while one-fourth has the normal phenotype?

answer is (a)

This would be probably true if the assumption that all possible genotypic variations would be equally distributed (so we would have 25% HH, 25% hh and 2x 25 Hh). If this distribution would be true and Huntingtons disease really was a single gene dominant trait diesase, then yes, we could expect such a distribution in the population. 

This is the most closely resembles the model. 

░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▐░░░░░░ ░░░░░░▄▄▄░░▄██▄░░░░░ ░░░░░▐▀█▀▌░░░░▀█▄░░░ ░░░░░▐█▄█▌░░░░░░▀█▄░ ░░░░░░▀▄▀░░░▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░ ░░░░▄▄▄██▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░ ░░░█▀▄▄▄█░▀▀░░░░░░░░ ░░░▌░▄▄▄▐▌▀▀▀░░░░░░░ ▄░▐░░░▄▄░█░▀▀░░░░░░░ u have been spooked by the ▀█▌░░░▄░▀█▀░▀░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░▄▄▐▌▄▄░░░░░░░ ░░░░░░░▀███▀█░▄░░░░░ ░░░░░░▐▌▀▄▀▄▀▐▄░░░░░ spooky skilenton ░░░░░▐▀░░░░░░▐▌░░░░░ ░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░█░░░░ ░░░░░▐▌░░░░░░░░░█░░░ ░░░░░█░░░░░░░░░░▐▌░░ send this to 4 ppl or skelintons will eat you