Ascientist makes a claim that two hominid species have a common evolutionary ancestor. what 3 processes must happen to ensure this claim can be considered valid?

The correct answer is option D, that is, scientific evidence must be found, verified, and accepted by the scientific community.

A scientific claim is one, which totally relies on systematic observation and proof. It is created to be far more reliable than any other kind of claim one could make. However, unfortunately, not every scientific claim is not true. Some of the findings are precise and reliable, while others exhibit flaws.

There is a difficulty in finding out the difference between them. Although to consider the claim put forward valid, there is a need to find out the scientific evidence, then verification has to be done, and then finally it has to get accepted by the scientific community.

hey bro i looked it up on google the structure of the eye-spot in euglena viridie, e. ehrenbergii, and phacus pyriyorme is not as franzé haa described it. the so-called “crystal body” and “lens bodies” were not found in any of the individuals of the species examined by me. as earlier observers have stated, the eye-spot consists simply of a mass of pigment granules arranged in a single layer, and probably embedded in a protoplasmic framework, but the latter could not be seen, and its presence was only inferred from the fact that the pigment granules must be held together in some way, thd the eye-spot as a whole is capable of expansion, and that the pigment granules can be separated from each other.

hope this   and an i get brainlsiest

answer: a) a compound microscope has a greater magnification ability than a simple microscope.

explanation: