The food-scarce environment of our ancestors likely led to humans' propensity to gorge when food is available and to crave high-caloric foods—a trait that might lead to an epidemic of obesity when food is plentiful. this illustrates how:

This setting will no longer happen for people nowadays are much conscious with their health and that people would not think of food scarcity, for all types of food are made available and that various fitness gym are everywhere. Being obese is lack of self-control and eating healthy diet is always choice. Therefore, evolve mechanisms are not always adaptive in modern society.

i don't know, but does anyone wanna be friends? i'm doing my homework at 1: 49 in the morning : /

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."