Does “survival of the fittest apply to domesticated animals? Why or why not? *

Yes.

Explanation:

This survival of the fittest is instinct helps domestic animals live. Just because an animal is domesticated, does not mean that instincts go away. Those instincts like hunting may get suppressed, but not taking away.

Survival of the fittest does not apply to domesticated animals. This is because these animals don't live in the wild so they don't have to run after things and kill them. Their food comes out of a tin and is provided by human beings. They don't have any predators so their lives are seldom at risk. Thus, they don't need to be fitter or more powerful than other animals in any way.

Lets take the example of pet dogs. We keep them for our support or simply because we enjoy their company. We provide them with food, shelter etc. and protect them. Since, we basically do everything for them; they need not evolve into a stronger, more powerful species.

However, in the case of stray dogs, they have to fight for their survival. They have to fight with other dogs for food and shelter. Hence, survival of the fittest will apply here as the strongest dog gets to eat.

Hope this helps.

Please mark me as brainliest.

picture a world where computers are building made-to-order personalized robotic arms and synthetic organs, drones are circulating above mars! due to the rapid growth of technology, the future has never been more unpredictable, and it presents a huge challenge in education: we are teaching students how to work in a future that we have never been unsure of. it is widely predicted that in eight years’ time, there will be more jobs in the fields of science, mathematics, technology and engineering than in any other discipline. and, as the technology continues to develop, it will soon become clear that addressing social problems will involve more innovative thinking, and analytical and technical knowledge than ever before. undeniably, there are no subjects that encourage innovative and creative thinking, deep thought, problem solving and independence more than the stem subjects. while it is widely commented on that there is a need to reimagine the ways stem subjects are taught in schools by embracing a more interactive and innovative approach to appeal to more students, it should come as no surprise that some of the most reputable educational organizations in the world are already implementing changes to embrace stem. harvard, for example, announced in 2014 that they were increasing their computer science faculty by over 50% and has since introduced computer science as a core subject for all freshmen. the urgency of supporting stem subjects at a young age is becoming more relevant than ever, as adopting a keen interest in the curricula needs to happen early. however, beyond the age issue is one of gender.

let me know if you need more