subject
Biology, 30.08.2021 21:30 pokenerdz

What would happen to life if there were no bacteria involved in biogeochemical cycles? A. There would be no difference since decomposition is an abiotic factor and cycling of nutrients would still occur.
B. The energy and nutrients required for life would be stuck and could not be cycled, thus life would cease.
C. There is no need for bacteria since they do not play any role in biogeochemical cycles, just plants and animals..
D. No one would know.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Biology

question
Biology, 22.06.2019 09:00
Group control group #1 experimental group yes yes yes control group #2 no new drug orange juice bed rest no yes no yes ves which of the following is the best explanation of why a second control group was included in this experiment? o a. to provide the volunteers in the study with something to drink o b. to prove that the common cold cannot be cured c. to confuse anyone who is trying to steal their new drug and sell it as their own invention o d. to researchers conclude that results are related to the new drug and not to the orange juice submit e previous
Answers: 3
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 09:00
The picture shows a location in india that is very dry and arid. notice the tall mountains in the background; you can find high amounts of vegetation on the other side of the mountains. which statement is most likely true for this area?
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 13:00
Why is the statement not a hypothesis? sunflowers require soil and plenty of sunlight and water to grow and thrive.
Answers: 3
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 13:30
What does it mean for an allele to be dominant?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What would happen to life if there were no bacteria involved in biogeochemical cycles? A. There wo...
Questions
question
History, 12.10.2019 10:10
question
Social Studies, 12.10.2019 10:10
question
History, 12.10.2019 10:10
question
Advanced Placement (AP), 12.10.2019 10:20
Questions on the website: 13722363