In trial 1, you will use 0.50 g of aluminum, and in trial 2, you will use only 0.25
g. why will you vary the amount of aluminum?

Changing the amount of reactants affects the amount of products produced in a chemical reaction. In a chemical reaction, only the atoms present in the reactants can end up in the products.

In trial one we use 0.50g of aluminium and in trial 2 we use 0.25g while keeping the other factors constant it means that you are changing the mass of reactant to see how it affects your reaction. In this reaction the mass of aluminium is variable that you are changing to see it affects on your reaction.

Or may be in second reaction you need less products so you reduce the amount of reactant.

In a chemical reaction, the number of reactants used and the product produced play a crucial role. Certain experiments are carried out with variable amounts of reactants.

In Trail 1, 0.50 grams of Aluminum is used, whereas, in Trial 2, only 0.25 grams of aluminum is used.

The amount of reactant is varied because the change in the amount of the reactant will affect the number of products produced.

In trial 1, the amount of aluminum used is 0.50 grams. In Trial 2, the amount of aluminum used is 0.25, such that the mass of reactants is changed but the other factors are kept constant.

The change in the mass of the reactants is variable to study the changes occurring in the chemical reaction.

Also, to reduce the number of products produced is required in less amount, thereby the amount of reactant used will be reduced. Trial 2 involved less amount aluminum.

Therefore, the variation in the mass of the reactants is to study the production of the products in a chemical reaction.

To know more about chemical reaction, refer to the following link:

link

the trilobite is used as an index fossil for various geologic time periods as specific types of the trilobites were present in different geological time periods. they are a group of marine arthropods belonging to the class of trilobita.

explanation:

why many students visually perceive stem as a vapid class?

for many students, however, stem subjects are optically discerned as vapid, tedious, and destitute of authentic-world applications. science and math have always been a major part of the high school curriculum, but many students have disengaged from these subjects because they don’t optically discern that they have any pertinence to the authentic world or students’ daily lives. for them, math and science have become a set of rules, procedures, laws, theorems, and formulas to memorize. some students even develop math apprehensiveness and cerebrate they are incapable of learning higher-level mathematics.

why is stem paramount?

as the u.s. economy changes, the ordinant dictation for stem-capable workers is growing. in may of 2014, the u.s. bureau of labor statistics counted more than 8.3 million stem jobs, which accounted for 6.2 percent of total employment in the cumulated states. that number is expected to perpetuate to increment as u.s. companies grow and innovate to compete in the ecumenical economy. according to the u.s. department of labor, the average salary for all stem jobs is $85,570, which is virtually double the average salary for all jobs.

many people still envision stem professionals as wearing a white lab coat and conducting research in a laboratory. in authenticity, some of the most in-demand stem fields are petroleum engineering, process engineering, and computer engineering. these fields that are experiencing shortages of qualified candidates are additionally among the highest paying, with the average petroleum engineer earning an annual salary of $147,520 in may 2014 according to the u.s. bureau of labor statistics.

in additament, stem subjects edify students valuable skills that are vital for prosperity in all vocations, even those that do not directly require stem erudition. engagement in stem subjects avails students develop quandary-solving, critical mentally conceiving, and leadership skills. these skills are so ecumenical, in fact, that statistics relinquished in the summer of 2013 by the u.s. census bureau designated that about three-quarters of the people with a bachelor’s degree in stem fields are not working in those vocations. many non-stem employers are poaching stem-qualified job candidates because they are more ingenious and collaborative than their non-stem counterparts.

as the ecumenical economy perpetuates to evolve, the desideratum for stem-capable workers will perpetuate to grow. by getting edifiers and students involved in the stem kineticism, an incipient generation of adroit workers will be poised to energize and expand this exhilarating field.

check this over.