Ascientist makes the argument that she has found dna evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. what would her evidence have to show for her to be correct? strong genetic similarities in closely related organisms and weak genetic similarities in distantly related organisms. weak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms. strong physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms. weak physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly re

B) on edge

Explanation:

Correct B). Weak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms

The evolution in a biology can be best described as the characteristics possessed by the species over several generations and it relies on the fact of natural selection given by the Charles Darwin. It is based on the concept that all the species are related and they slowly change over time.

According to the evolutionary theory strong genetic similarities in closely related organisms and weak genetic similarities in distantly related organisms as they gradually evolve as a result of natural selection.

But, according to the question evolution does not exist, so the answer would be option B.

do yall know the answer?