3. Which solution would be better to implement? Justify your answer.

The Other Parts Of This Question

Explanation:

You Can't Expect To Answer Your Question If There Is No Proper Question

Better solutions that could be better is by encouraging populations of this problem and by encouraging this with a community program of pros and cons to this factor of life in the sea. If the community can encourage this problem to be solved, like the problems with trees being cut down. Then I can create a community that helps reduce the levels of pollution and acids that the ocean takes in. So that this can save many reefs and the species that live within the reefs. (This would be a better implementation for me to solve this problem.)

Explanation:

I don't think that there is a right answer. If there is then good for you! This is my answer for the question in my mind. This is also the answer I gave to my teacher on Edu. (I hope this gives an idea for something)

I agree with the person above!

it would affect precipitation by causing flooding in some areas of the world due to climate increasing, causing the glaciers in the northern and southern pole of our planet to melt.

i wish you would have provided choices to simplify it and allow me to give an exact answer.

they absorb it i think

not sure

you